Very Long-Term Complete Remission Can Be Achieved in Men With High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer and a Very High PSA Value: An Analysis of the GETUG 12 Phase 3 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is a well-known prognostic parameter in men with prostate cancer. The treatment of men with very high PSA values and apparently no detectable metastases is not fully established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ancillary analysis from the GETUG 12 phase 3 trial. Patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer by bone and computerized tomography (CT) scan were randomly assigned to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel plus estramustine or ADT alone. Relapse-free survival (RFS), clinical RFS, metastases-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for different levels of PSA (50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL). The relationship between PSA and outcomes was studied using residual-based approaches and spline functions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 12 years (range: 0-15.3). Baseline PSA (<50 ng/mL, n = 328; ≥50ng/mL, n = 85) was associated with improved RFS (P = .0005), cRFS (P = .0024), and MFS (P = .0068). The 12-year RFS rate was 46.33% (CI 40.59-51.86), 33.59% (CI 22.55-44.97), and 11.76% (1.96-31.20) in men with PSA values <50 ng/mL (n = 328), 50-100 ng/mL (n = 68), and ≥100 ng/mL (n = 17), respectively. Exploratory analyses revealed no deviation from the linear relationship assumption between PSA and the log hazard of events. CONCLUSIONS: Men with apparently localized prostate cancer and a high baseline PSA value have a reasonable chance of being long-term disease-free when treated with curative intent combining systemic and local therapy.

Platinum(IV)-Estramustine Multiaction Prodrugs Are Effective Antiproliferative Agents against Prostate Cancer Cells.

Herein, we describe the synthesis, characterization, and biological properties of Pt(IV) derivatives of cisplatin with estramustine at the first axial position, which is known to disrupt the microtubule assembly and act as an androgen antagonist, and varying the second axial position using an innocent ligand (acetate or hydroxyl) to prepare dual-action and triple-action prodrugs with known inhibitors of histone deacetylase, cyclooxygenase, and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. We demonstrate superior antiproliferative activity at submicromolar concentrations of the prodrugs against a panel of cancer cell lines, particularly against prostate cancer cell lines. The results obtained in this study exemplify the complex mode of action of "multiaction" Pt(IV) prodrugs. Interestingly, changing the second axial ligand in the Pt-estramustine complex has a significant effect on the mode of action, suggesting that all three components of the Pt(IV) prodrugs (platinum moiety and axial ligands) contribute to the killing of cells and not just one dominant component.

Long-term Castration-related Outcomes in Patients With High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With Androgen Deprivation Therapy With or Without Docetaxel and Estramustine in the UNICANCER GETUG-12 Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel and estramustine (DE) significantly improved relapse-free survival in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for 3 years and a local treatment in the GETUG-12 phase III trial. We sought to explore whether the addition of DE impacts long-term treatment-related side effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomized within the UNICANCER GETUG-12 trial at Gustave Roussy who were alive when ADT was discontinued were followed-up prospectively. Serum testosterone levels and clinical data regarding body weight, libido, erection, and cardio-vascular events were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were included: 36 patients had been treated with ADT plus a local treatment and 42 with ADT+DE plus a local treatment. With a median follow-up of 5.9 years after ADT discontinuation, serum testosterone levels returned to normal values (> 200 ng/mL) for 57 (78%) of 72 evaluable patients, and 29 (43%) of 68 evaluable patients reported erections allowing intercourse without medical assistance. No impact of DE on testosterone level recovery, libido, quality of erections, and changes in body weight after ADT discontinuation was detected. The incidence of cardiovascular events was low and similar in both treatment arms. CONCLUSION: Treatment with DE was not associated with excess long-term castration-related toxicity in men with high-risk localized prostate cancer. The relapse-free survival improvement seen with DE in GETUG-12 is likely not related to differed testosterone recovery.

Prostate Cancer: Biology, Incidence, Detection Methods, Treatment Methods, and Vaccines.

Cancer of the prostate are cancers in which most incidences are slow-growing, and in the U.S., a record of 1.2 million new cases of prostate cancer occurred in 2018. The rates of this type of cancer have been increasing in developing nations. The risk factors for prostate cancer include age, family history, and obesity. It is believed that the rate of prostate cancer is correlated with the Western diet. Various advances in methods of radiotherapy have contributed to lowering morbidity. Therapy for hormone- refractory prostate cancer is making progress, for almost all men with metastases will proceed to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Smoking cigarettes along with the presence of prostate cancer has been shown to cause a higher risk of mortality in prostate cancer. The serious outcome of incontinence and erectile dysfunction result from the cancer treatment of surgery and radiation, particularly for prostate- specific antigen detected cancers that will not cause morbidity or mortality. Families of patients, as well as patients, are profoundly affected following the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Poor communication between spouses during prostate cancer increases the risk for poor adjustment to prostate cancer. The use of serum prostate-specific antigen to screen for prostate cancer has led to a greater detection, in its early stage, of this cancer. Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men, accounting for more than 29% of all diagnosed cancers and about 13% of all cancer deaths. A shortened course of hormonal therapy with docetaxel following radical prostatectomy (or radiation therapy) for high-risk prostate cancer has been shown to be both safe and feasible. Patients treated with docetaxel-estramustine had a prostate-specific antigen response decline of at least 50%. Cancer vaccines are an immune-based cancer treatment that may provide the promise of a non-toxic but efficacious therapeutic alternative for cancer patients. Further studies will elucidate improved methods of detection and treatment.

Oncological outcome of neoadjuvant low-dose estramustine plus LHRH agonist/antagonist followed by extended radical prostatectomy for Japanese patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer: a prospective single-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) are prone to have worse pathological diagnoses of positive surgical margins and/or lymph node invasion, resulting in early biochemical recurrence (BCR) despite having undergone radical prostatectomy (RP). Therefore, it is controversial whether patients with high-risk PCa should undergo RP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NAC) followed by "extended" RP. METHODS: A total of 87 patients with high-risk PCa prospectively underwent extended RP after NAC; most of the patients underwent 6 months of estramustine phosphate (EMP) 140 mg twice daily, along with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist. We developed our surgical technique to reduce the rate of positive surgical margins. We aimed to approach the muscle layer of the rectum by dissecting the mesorectal fascia and continuing the dissection through the mesorectum until the muscle layer of the rectum was exposed. RESULTS: More than 1 year had elapsed after surgery in all 86 patients, with a median follow-up period of 37.7 months. The 3-year BCR-free survival was 74.9%. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis revealed that a positive core ratio of 50% or greater and pathological stage of pT3 or greater were independent predictors for BCR. About 17 of 23 cases received salvage androgen deprivation therapy and concurrent external beam radiotherapy, and showed no progression after the salvage therapies. CONCLUSIONS: NAC concordant with extended RP is feasible and might provide good cancer control for patients with high-risk PCa.

Expanding the Arsenal of PtIV Anticancer Agents: Multi-action PtIV Anticancer Agents with Bioactive Ligands Possessing a Hydroxy Functional Group.

Most multi-action PtIV prodrugs have bioactive ligands containing carboxylates. This is probably due to the ease of carboxylating the OH axial ligands and because following reduction, the active drug is released. A major challenge is to expand the arsenal of bioactive ligands to include those without carboxylates. We describe a general approach for synthesis of PtIV prodrugs that release drugs with OH groups. We linked the OH groups of gemcitabine (Gem), paclitaxel (Tax), and estramustine (EM) to the PtIV derivative of cisplatin by a carbonate bridge. Following reduction, the axial ligands lost CO2 , rapidly generating the active drugs. In contrast, succinate-linked drugs did not readily release the free drugs. The carbonate-bridged ctc-[Pt(NH3 )2 (PhB)(Gem-Carb)Cl2 ] was significantly more cytotoxic than the succinate-bridged ctc-[Pt(NH3 )2 (PhB)(Gem-Suc)Cl2 ], and more potent and less toxic than gemcitabine, cisplatin, and co-administration of cisplatin and gemcitabine.

Long responders to estramustine monophosphate. Report of two cases and literature review. / Repondedores a largo plazo a Estramustina monofosfato. A propósito de dos casos. Revisión bibliográfica.

OBJECTIVE: Estramustine is an stable estradiol and nitrogenated mustard conjugatewith antymicotic properties. Currently, with the appearance of chemotherapy and new molecules, estramustin acetate is not a drug of choice for castration resistant prostate cancer. METHODS: We describe two patients with castration resistant prostate cancer under treatment with estramustine acetate and complete biochemical response and stable disease. We review the literature to elucidate if the drug should be stopped and changed for the new molecules that have demonstrated survival increase. RESULTS: To our knowledge, there are not data in the literature to either solve the questions posed or shed light regarding cumulative toxicity due to prolongued use of estramustine acetate. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that these clinical cases do not translate that estramustine acetate is a first line treatment for patients with CRPC. Nevertheless, they translate the heterogeneity of CRPC. It would be interesting to investigate the combination of new agents with estramustine acetate as well as the search of biomarkers that enable selection of candidates who could respond to estramustine acetate.

OBJETIVO: La estramustina es un conjugado estable de estradiol y una mostaza nitrogenada que tiene propiedades antimitóticas. Actualmente, con la aparición de la quimioterpia y las nuevas moléculas, el acetato de estramustina -no es un fármaco de elección en el cáncer de próstata resistente a castración.MÉTODO: Describimos dos pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración en tratamiento con acetato de estramustina, y con una respuesta bioquímica completa y enfermedad estable. Revisamos la literatura para dilucidar si se debería retirar el acetato de estramustina y cambiar por las nuevas moléculas que han demostrado un aumento de supervivencia. RESULTADO: Hasta donde llega nuestro conocimiento, no hay datos en la literatura que resuelvan las dudas planteadas y tampoco que aporten luz en cuanto a la toxicidad acumulada por el uso prolongado del acetato de estramustina.CONCLUSIÓN: Somos conscientes de que estos casos clínicos no traducen que el acetato de estramustina sea un tratamiento de primera línea para los pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración. Sin embargo, traducen la heterogeneidad del CPRC. Sería interesante investigar la combinación de los nuevos agentes con el acetato de estramustina así como la búsqueda de biomarcadores que permitan la selección de los candidatos que podrían responder al acetato de estramustina.

Long responders to estramustine monophosphate. Report of two cases and literature review / Repondedores a largo plazo a Estramustina monofosfato. A propósito de dos casos. Revisión bibliográfica

Objective: Estramustine is an stable estradiol and nitrogenated mustard conjugatewith antymicotic properties. Currently, with the appearance of chemotherapy and new molecules, estramustin acetate is not a drug of choice for castration resistant prostate cancer. Methods: We describe two patients with castration resistant prostate cancer under treatment with estramustine acetate and complete biochemical response and stable disease. We review the literature to elucidate if the drug should be stopped and changed for the new molecules that have demonstrated survival increase. Results: To our knowledge, there are not data in the literature to either solve the questions posed or shed light regarding cumulative toxicity due to prolongued use of estramustine acetate. Conclusions: We recognize that these clinical cases do not translate that estramustine acetate is a first line treat ment for patients with CRPC. Nevertheless, they translate the heterogeneity of CRPC. It would be interesting to investigate the combination of new agents with estramustine acetate as well as the search of biomarkers that enable selection of candidates who could respond to estramustine acetat. Conclusions: We recognize that these clinical cases do not translate that estramustine acetate is a first line treat

OBJETIVO: La estramustina es un conjugado estable de estradiol y una mostaza nitrogenada que tiene propiedades antimitóticas. Actualmente, con la aparición de la quimioterpia y las nuevas moléculas, el acetato de estramustina -no es un fármaco de elección en el cáncer de próstata resistente a castración. MÉTODO: Describimos dos pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración en tratamiento con acetato de estramustina, y con una respuesta bioquímica completa y enfermedad estable. Revisamos la literatura para dilucidar si se debería retirar el acetato de estramustina y cambiar por las nuevas moléculas que han demostrado un aumento de supervivencia. RESULTADO: Hasta donde llega nuestro conocimiento, no hay datos en la literatura que resuelvan las dudas planteadas y tampoco que aporten luz en cuanto a la toxicidad acumulada por el uso prolongado del acetato de estramustina. CONCLUSIÓN: Somos conscientes de que estos casos clínicos no traducen que el acetato de estramustina sea un tratamiento de primera línea para los pacientes con cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración. Sin embargo, traducen la heterogeneidad del CPRC. Sería interesante investigar la combinación de los nuevos agentes con el acetato de estramustina así como la búsqueda de biomarcadores que permitan la selección de los candidatos que podrían responder al acetato de estramustina

Radical Prostatectomy With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Pretreatment for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Comparative Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our NCHT protocol involved complete androgen blockade followed by 6 cycles of docetaxel (30 mg/m2) plus estramustine phosphate (560 mg). NCHT was provided to 60 patients with PCa before RP, and we compared the clinical and pathologic outcomes with those of 349 patients with high-risk PCa who underwent RP alone using propensity score matching. The data for those who underwent RP alone were obtained from the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database. RESULTS: In the NCHT group, 10.0% experienced pathologic complete response, 3.3% had positive surgical margins, and 13.3% developed severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) after RP. The median follow-up duration was 42.5 months, and the 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival was 60.1%. In multivariate analysis, pN+ was an independent prognostic factor for BCR (hazard ratio = 5.251, 95%CI 1.300-21.201; P = .020). In propensity score matching, the BCR rate in the NCHT group was significantly lower than that in the RP alone group (P = .021). In subgroup analyses, the BCR rate in patients with a single high-risk factor was significantly lower in the NCHT group than in the RP-alone group (P = .027). CONCLUSION: NCHT before RP can reduce the risk of BCR in patients with high-risk PCa, particularly if a single high-risk factor is present. However, the potential for perioperative complications should be considered.

Estramustine Phosphate Inhibits TGF-ß-Induced Mouse Macrophage Migration and Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Production.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-ß) has been demonstrated as a key regulator of immune responses including monocyte/macrophage functions. TGF-ß regulates macrophage cell migration and polarization, as well as it is shown to modulate macrophage urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) production, which also contributes to macrophage chemotaxis and migration toward damaged or inflamed tissues. Microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton dynamic plays a key role during the cell motility, and any interference on the MT network profoundly affects cell migration. In this study, by using estramustine phosphate (EP), which modifies MT stability, we analysed whether tubulin cytoskeleton contributes to TGF-ß-induced macrophage cell migration and uPA expression. We found out that, in the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7, EP at noncytotoxic concentrations inhibited cell migration and uPA expression induced by TGF-ß. Moreover, EP greatly reduced the capacity of TGF-ß to trigger the phosphorylation and activation of its downstream Smad3 effector. Furthermore, Smad3 activation seems to be critical for the increased cell motility. Thus, our data suggest that EP, by interfering with MT dynamics, inhibits TGF-ß-induced RAW 264.7 cell migration paralleled with reduction of uPA induction, in part by disabling Smad3 activation by TGF-ß.

Phase 2 Study of Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Estramustine in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: There are no effective chemotherapies for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) whose disease has failed to respond to taxanes or patients who do not wish to receive intravenous drugs. We hypothesized that low doses of multiple medications with prolonged exposure would result in a high response rate and low toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with mCRPC were eligible for this phase 2 trial. The primary endpoint was a prostate-specific antigen decrease of more than 50%. CEE consisted of cyclophosphamide (50 mg/m2), etoposide (50 mg/m2), and estramustine 280 mg provided orally once a day for 14-day cycles every 28 days. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled and included in all evaluations. The prostate-specific antigen response rate was 46% in all patients, 53% in chemotherapy-naive subjects, and 31% after docetaxel chemotherapy. Thirty subjects had measurable lesions, 1 (3%) had complete response, 2 (7%) partial response, and 22 (73%) stable disease, for a clinical benefit of 83%. Sixty percent experienced an improvement in their performance status, and 65% reported improvement in their pain. The median overall survival was 18.6 months in all patients, 20.4 months in chemotherapy-naive patients and 11.3 months in patients whose disease progressed while receiving docetaxel therapy. Grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities included 20% neutropenia, 10% thrombocytopenia, 10% deep-vein thrombosis, 8% anemia, 8% fatigue, 4% death, and 2% anorexia and stomatitis. CONCLUSION: CEE was an all-oral, easy-to-administer, and effective triple-drug therapy for patients with mCRPC.

The efficacy and safety comparison of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, estramustine, and mitoxantrone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, docetaxel + estramustine, mitoxantrone in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). METHODS: Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrance Library and Embase were searched for studies published from when the databases were established to January 1st, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared docetaxel + prednisone (DP), cabazitaxel + prednisone (CP), docetaxel + estramustine + prednisone (DEP), and mitoxantrone + cabazitaxel + prednisone (MP) for CRPC treatment were identified. The network meta-analysis was conducted with software R 3.3.2. We analyzed the main outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, tumor response and severe adverse events (AEs). Ranking of the chemotherapeutic agents was based on probabilities of interventions for each of the outcomes that were performed. The consistency of direct and indirect evidence was assessed by node splitting. RESULTS: 10 RCTs, with 3590 patients, were analyzed. The network meta-analysis results revealed that CP significantly increased OS, PFS, PSA response, tumor response, and severe AEs compared to MP. DP showed similar results with CP except for tumor response, where it showed slight inferiority in effectiveness. DEP was associated with clearly improved outcomes in PFS, PSA response and tumor response compared to those of MP, but this was not the case for OS benefit and severe AEs. No significant difference was detected in DP, CP and DEP except for the outcomes of severe AEs. MP was less effective in survival and clinical benefit, but much safer in safety outcomes than other chemotherapy agents. The probabilities of rank plots showed that CP ranked first in OS and tumor response; DEP ranked first in PFS time and PSA response; MP was the best treatment mode for safety. CONCLUSIONS: DP and CP survival benefit (OS, PFS) and clinical benefit (PSA response and tumor response) were comparable, as well as their associated AEs. DEP was associated with less survival benefit, similar clinical improvement and more AEs than DP or CP. MP had the lowest survival and clinical benefit but excellent safety than other agents. Based on evidences of current results, we recommended CP as the most suitable chemotherapy agent for CRPC patients, followed by DP, MP as third, and DEP as the last choice. However, considering limitations of our network meta-analysis, additional high-quality studies are needed for further evaluation.

Estramustine phosphate induces prostate cancer cell line PC3 apoptosis by down-regulating miR-31 levels.

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer seriously threats to patient's life and health. Estramustine phosphate (EP) is one of the most important drugs in the clinical treatment of prostate cancer. This study aims to explore the molecular mechanism of estramustine phosphate in regulating PC3 cell growth and survive through mediating miR-31. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Estramustine phosphate was used to treat prostate cancer cell line PC3. Flow cytometry was applied to detect PC3 cell growth and apoptosis. RT-PCR was performed to test miR-31 level. Prostate cancer tissue and paracarcinoma tissue were collected to test miR-31 level. PC3 cells were transfected with miR-31 or control microRNA by lipofectamine, and followed treated by estramustine phosphate. RESULTS: PC3 cell appeared growth restrain and apoptosis after treated by estramustine phosphate. MiR-31 level decreased after estramustine phosphate treatment. Prostate cancer tissue presented higher miR-31 level than paracarcinoma tissue. MiR-31 over-expression inhibited estramustine phosphate induced PC3 cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Estramustine phosphate induces prostate cancer cell line PC3 apoptosis through reducing miR-31.

Phase 2 Study of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Estramustine in Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Prostate Carcinoma: ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E1898) Trial.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter phase 2 study assessed the combination of estramustine and weekly paclitaxel with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 77 patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for CRPC between 1998 and 2000; a total of 74 subjects were eligible for the study. Each 8-week cycle included paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 provided intravenously weekly for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off therapy and oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily for 3 days beginning 24 hours before the first dose of paclitaxel. The primary end point was rate of objective or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response at 16 weeks. A 50% response rate was considered of further interest. RESULTS: Eligible patients received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). The response rate among patients with measurable disease was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-52). The PSA response rate was 58% (95% CI, 47-70). Clinical benefit rate was 45% (95% CI, 33-57). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.7). The median overall survival was 17.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-20.8). The most common clinical grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and sensory neuropathy (7%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included lymphopenia (21%) and anemia (9%). There was one toxicity-related death. Quality-of-life scores improved by week 8, but the change was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The combination has activity defined by PSA declines in CRPC but did not meet the protocol-specified end point for efficacy as defined by objective response rate. Since this study was conducted, more effective, better-tolerated regimens have been developed.

Cost-effectiveness comparison between neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

The aim of the present study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) compared to neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist and estramustine. We retrospectively analyzed data within Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database containing 2971 PC patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at four institutes between July 1996 and July 2017. We identified 237 and 403 high-risk patients who underwent RP and ePLND (ePLND group), and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by RP and limited PLND (neoadjuvant group), respectively. The oncological outcomes and cost-effectiveness were compared between groups. Medical cost calculation focused on PC-related medication and adjuvant radiotherapy. Biochemical recurrence-free and overall survival rates in the neoadjuvant group were significantly higher than those in the ePLND group. Significantly higher number of patients progressed to castration-resistant PC in the ePLND group than in the neoadjuvant group. Background-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) revealed that neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy independently reduced the risk of biochemical recurrence after RP. The 5-year cost per person was significantly higher in the ePLND group than in the neoadjuvant group. Although the present study was retrospective, neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by RP as a concurrent strategy has potential to improve oncological outcome and cost-effectiveness.

Dendrimer conjugated estramustine nanocrystalline 'Dendot': An effective inhibitor of DMBA-TPA induced papilloma formation in mouse.

Clinically approved anticancer drug estramustine mediates its function by impairing microtubule polymerization. However, the low aqueous solubility and high toxicity limit its anticancer activity via the oral route. Previously, efforts have been made to develop an enhanced water soluble form of estramustine as estramustine phosphate (EM) but acidic gastrointestinal pH breaks the phosphate derivative via oral administration. As an alternative approach, we have made an effort to enhance solubility and minimize toxicity in vivo by conjugating EM to a poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer, which generated the sustained release of dendrimer conjugate (DEM). To the best of our knowledge, for the first time, we report the direct proof of the nano-crystalline 'DenDot' of DEM on TEM image. The toxicity study showed that both EM and DEM were nontoxic up to 20mg/kg. A comparative anti-papilloma study was also performed with EM and dendrimer conjugates (DEM) using a two-stage mouse skin carcinogenesis model. We found that DEM was more effective in inhibiting skin tumor formation than EM. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry studies further indicated that DEM treatment increased cell apoptosis, and reduced epithelial hyperplasia, cell proliferation and inflammation in skin tissues of mice. In addition, the synthetic DEM conjugate inhibited skin tumor progression more effectively than EM.

Overall survival of high-risk prostate cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable, biochemical recurrence-free survival in high-risk PCa patients treated with a neoadjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist and estramustine phosphate (EMP) (chemohormonal therapy; CHT) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). We conducted a retrospective study to elucidate the clinical benefit of neoadjuvant CHT for high-risk PCa patients. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 1254 PCa patients who underwent RP and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy between July 1996 and April 2016 at Hirosaki University. According to the D'Amico risk classification, we focused on 613 patients in the high-risk group. The high-risk PCa patients were further divided into two groups based on whether the patients received neoadjuvant CHT before RP (EMP group) or not (non-EMP group). The endpoint was overall survival (OS) after surgery. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 98.5 and 92.6%, respectively. The 10-year OS rate in the EMP group was significantly higher compared to the non-EMP group (P = 0.021). In multivariate analysis, administration of neoadjuvant CHT, lymph node involvement, and castration-resistant PCa status were significantly associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: RP with neoadjuvant CHT using EMP for high-risk PCa patients provided excellent long-term OS.

[Low-Dose Estramustine Phosphate Monotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients].

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) monotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We administered EMP at 140 or 280 mg/day to 89 patients between January 2003 and December 2012. None of the patients were receiving concomitant dexamethasone and none had ever been treated with docetaxel. Fifty-three patients (59.6%) experienced a decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, including 20 (22.5%) with a decline of more than 50%. The median time to PSA progression was 90 days. PSA-progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with EMP 140 mg compared with patients treated with EMP 280 mg, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. The most frequent toxicities were nausea and anorexia. Two patients had grade 3 adverse events of pulmonary embolism and liver dysfunction. EMP treatment was discontinued in nine patients (10.1%) because of side effects (nausea and anorexia in 7, liver dysfunction and lacunar infarction in 1). Low-dose EMP monotherapy is well tolerated and can effectively reduce PSA levels.

Efficacy of a neoadjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate in high-risk prostate cancer: a single-center study.

PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. We previously reported favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) for high-risk Pca patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy comprising a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist plus low-dose estramustine (LHRH + EMP) prior to radical prostatectomy (RP). In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy comprising a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist plus low-dose estramustine phosphate (GnRH + EMP) in patients with high-risk Pca. METHODS: Between September 2005 and March 2016, we identified 406 high-risk Pca patients of whom 136 received neoadjuvant GnRH + EMP (GnRH group) and 270 received LHRH + EMP (LHRH group) before RP. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and pathological covariates between the two groups. The endpoint was the rate of pathological T0 status. RESULTS: The rates of pathological T0 status were 11.0 and 8.9% in the GnRH group and LHRH group, respectively (P = 0.490). The 2-year BRFS rates were 97.8% in the GnRH group and 87.8% in the LHRH group (P = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that neoadjuvant GnRH antagonist + EMP followed by RP may improve the pathological outcomes and reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk Pca. Further prospective studies to confirm these findings are warranted.

The impact of extended lymph node dissection versus neoadjuvant therapy with limited lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.

The optimal treatment for high-risk prostate cancer (Pca) remains to be established. The current guidelines recommend extended pelvic lymph node dissection (e-PLND) for selected intermediate- and high-risk patients treated with RP. However, the indications, optimal extent, and therapeutic benefits of e-PLND remain unclear. The aim of this study was to assess whether e-PLND confers an oncological benefit for high-risk Pca compared to neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and estramustine (LHRH + EMP). The Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database contained the data of 2403 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP at four institutes between March 2000 and December 2014. In the e-PLND group, we identified 238 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and e-PLND, with lymphatic tissue removal around the obturator and the external iliac regions, and hypogastric lymph node dissection. The neoadjuvant therapy with limited PLND (l-PLND) group included 280 high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP and removal of the obturator node chain between September 2005 and June 2014 at Hirosaki University. The outcome measure was BRFS. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates for the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group and e-PLND group were 84.9 and 54.7%, respectively (P < 0.0001). The operative time was significantly longer in the e-PLND group compared to that of the neoadjuvant therapy with l-PLND group. Grade 3/4 surgery-related complications were not identified in both groups. Although the present study was not randomized, neoadjuvant LHRH + EMP therapy followed by RP might reduce the risk of biochemical recurrence.